Answer:
strengths and weaknesses
Explanation:
An analysis of <u>strengths and weaknesses</u> examines internal factors that give the organization certain advantages and disadvantages in meeting the needs of its target markets. This also known as the SWOT analysis, A SWOT analysis is used by business to identify threats and opportunities in a proposed business venture or intending project.
Answer:
The multinational corporation in the Philippines are doing well and sometime more good than the other Asian countries.
Explanation:
Philippines is a country in the southeast Asia. It is a developing country. Lately, many of the foreign companies and multinational corporations are investing in Philippines and it extremely boosting the economy of Philippines.
Many multinational companies are being set up in Philippines and it is helping Philippines to rise its economy. The employment rate of Philippines is also increasing as new companies are establishing in Philippines and bring out new job opportunities in the country.
This has also lead to better management skills of the people of Philippines as the people are trained to work in the corporate.
Their GDP is also increasing. Thus Philippines is performing far better than their other neighboring countries in the South east Asia.
Answer:
a. macrosociology
Explanation:
Macrosociology: In sociology, the term macrosociology is defined as a sociological approach that signifies the populations and social systems analysis on quite a large scale, social structure's level, and at a theoretical abstraction's level.
Macrosociology focuses on large-scale social processes, for example, social change and social stability.
Example: Study of economy and social class.
In the question above, the statement signifies the importance of macrosociology.
No.
As a charged isn't constrained to give prove in a criminal antagonistic continuing, they may not be addressed by a prosecutor or judge unless they do as such. Be that as it may, should they choose to affirm, they are liable to round of questioning and could be discovered liable of prevarication. As the race to keep up a charged individual's entitlement to quiet keeps any examination or round of questioning of that individual's position, it takes after that the choice of advice in the matter of what proof will be called is an essential strategy regardless in the ill-disposed framework and thus it may be said that it is a legal counselor's control of reality. Surely, it requires the aptitudes of insight on the two sides to be decently similarly hollowed and subjected to an unbiased judge.
By differentiate, while litigants in most affable law frameworks can be constrained to give an announcement, this announcement isn't liable to round of questioning by the prosecutor and not given under vow. This enables the litigant to clarify his side of the case without being liable to round of questioning by a talented resistance. Notwithstanding, this is predominantly on the grounds that it isn't the prosecutor yet the judges who question the respondent. The idea of "cross"- examination is altogether due to antagonistic structure of the customary law.
Judges in an antagonistic framework are unprejudiced in guaranteeing the reasonable play of due process, or basic equity. Such judges choose, regularly when called upon by advise as opposed to of their own movement, what confirm is to be conceded when there is a debate; however in some customary law wards judges assume to a greater extent a part in choosing what confirmation to concede into the record or reject. Best case scenario, mishandling legal carefulness would really make ready to a one-sided choice, rendering out of date the legal procedure being referred to—run of law being illegally subordinated by lead of man under such separating conditions.
