Answer:
The correct option is E.
Explanation:
That is, the US Supreme Court established that state governments can regulate private industries that affect the "common good" since grain storage facilities were dedicated to public use, therefore , their rates were subject to public regulation.
Answer and Explanation:
Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.
Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.
2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.
Answer:
A demurrer.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A pleading filed by one party to dismiss the other party's pleading for failing to state a cause of action is known as a demurrer.
This ultimately implies that, a demurrer is a pleading written by the defendant as a response to a court proceeding in which he or she acknowledges that the allegations in a complaint might be true and factual but it is insufficient to justify or establish a valid legal action.
For example, a party might file for a demurrer if a complaint infringes his or her right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Constitution.
Answer:
The main difference between a salary and an hourly wage is that when someone is being paid monthly it means that their salary is fixed, meaning that the amount of money they get at the end of the month is not prone to changes. On the other hand, we have a wage earner who is paid by the hour of a specific work they do. It means that if they work 40 hours per week, they will get a certain amount of money but if they work an hour or two longer, they have the right to recieve that extra pay.
