Answer:
the marginal revenue product of baseball players is greater than the marginal revenue product of college professors.
Explanation:
Baseball players are responsible for a baseball teams' revenues, and they add up billions of dollars per year. For example, Max Scherzer sells jerseys, caps and other merchandise for millions of dollars, and his team winning the World Series this year increases the team's revenue greatly. Sometimes even without winning a championship some players still generate lots of revenue.
An individual's salary should be proportional to the revenue that they generate. Colleges have huge amounts of revenue, and college professors are responsible for a large portion of it.
The problem hear is that there are a lot of college professors and assistants, and the revenue must be split between many people. For example, Harvard University's revenue is about $5.5 billion per year, but it has over 16,000 employees (including about 2,400 professors).
Answer:
Bad debt expense (w/o allowance) = $2,875
Bad debt expense ( with allowance) = $2,675.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Net credit sales = $115,000
Uncollectible percentage = 2.5%
So, we can calculate the bad debt expense without Allowance for doubtful accounts by using following method:
Bad debt expense ( W/o allowance) = $115,000 × 2.5%
= $2,875
After Allowance for doubtful expense
Bad debt expense = $2,875 - $200
= $2,675
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer: manufacturing
Explanation:
In an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, the manufacturing component provides information on production costs and pricing.
Enterprise Resource Planning is the gathering and organization of business data by using an integrated software suite.
It should be noted that ERP software typically contains applications that helps in automating certain business functions such as sales quoting, production, accounting etc
