Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
5–3 = 2
8–5 = 3
12–8 = 4
17–12 = 5
x-17 should be 6, hence x = 6+17 = 23.
Step-by-step explanation:
Tan ( a + b ) = [ tan a + tan b ] / [ 1 - (tan a)*(tan b) ];
let be a = 2x and b = x;
=> tan 3x = [ tan 2x + tan x ] / [ 1 - (tan 2x)*(tan x) ] => (tan 3x)*[ 1 - (tan 2x)*(tan x) ] =
tan 2x + tan x => tan3x - tan 3xtan 2xtanx = tan 2x + tan x => <span> tan 3x−tan 2x−tanx = tan 3xtan 2xtanx.</span><span />