The correct answer is C. All of the above.
Explanation
Naturalistic observation is a research method by observing a subject or group of individuals or animals directly in their place of residence. Another of its main characteristics is that the researcher must refrain from disturbing or intervening in the lives of those observed to avoid any interference that implies a different behavior than they would have if the observer were not there.
Therefore, it can be concluded that during a naturalistic observation the researcher should be prevented from having behavior that modifies the behavior of the observed group or individual; The observer must be prevented from making value judgments about the results obtained and from subjective or biased views, and the observer must avoid transmitting a message to the observed of how they should behave while they are observed because this can alter their actions. Therefore, the correct answer is C. All of the above.
The correct answers are treatment; depression levels.
Answer 1: The independent variable (IV) in this study is the treatment the clients receive; that is, whether or not they received <span>cognitive-behavioral treatment. An IV is an experimental variable in a study that is controlled and manipulated in order to measure its effects on dependent variables or outcomes.
Answer 2: </span>The dependent variable (DV) in this study is the clients' depression levels. DVs refer to outcome variables or results that are obtained as a result of manipulating an IV. In this instance, the manipulation of the IV (whether the participants received cognitive-behavioral treatment or were instead wait-listed) led to the DV- clients' depression levels. Specifically the researchers were investigating whether receiving the treatment had an influence on clients' depression levels.
Answer:
The partial-birth abortion statute, which sort of has come to light because of the Planned Parenthood tape, which they obviously used partial birth abortion to deliver some of these babies...The Supreme Court said it was unconstitutional. What we did as a member of Congress is we passed a law outlawing partial-birth abortion again, and we said to the Supreme Court, you’re wrong. And we actually listed the reasons why we thought the court was wrong. We made a minor — and I mean really minor change in the bill. Senate passed it. President Bush signed it and — guess what? The Supreme Court reversed itself.
