The first thing we are going to do is find the area of the field. To do this we are going to use the area of a square formula:
![A=s^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3Ds%5E2)
Were
![A](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A)
is the area in square kilometers
![s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s)
is one of the sides of the square
We know for our problem that the side lengths of the field are 0.9 kilometers, so
![s=0.9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s%3D0.9)
. Lets replace that value in our formula to find
![A](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A)
:
![A=(0.9)^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%280.9%29%5E2)
Now, to find the population density of the filed, we are going to use the population density formula:
![P_{d}= \frac{I}{A}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7Bd%7D%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BI%7D%7BA%7D%20)
where
![P_{d}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7Bd%7D)
is the population density in <span>in burrows per square kilometer
</span>
![I](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=I)
is the number of burrows
![A](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A)
is the are of the field
We know that
![I=1980](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=I%3D1980)
and
![A=0.81](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D0.81)
, so lets replace those values in our formula:
![P_{d}= \frac{1980}{0.81}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7Bd%7D%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1980%7D%7B0.81%7D%20)
![P_{d}=2444.4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7Bd%7D%3D2444.4)
We can conclude that the <span>density of prairie dog burrows is approximately
2444 burrws per square kilometer.</span>
Answer:
To provide a baseline for judging the survival rates of infants who received whole-body cooling
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, the purpose of the experiment is to see whether reducing body temperature for three days after birth increased the rate of survival without brain damage.
Then, the proposed method (whole-body cooling) has to be contrasted with the baseline, in this case, the "usual care". If we want to know if this proposed method is statistically better, we have to compare with these baseline with random sampling out of the same population.
If it is not compared to nothing or to a new method, it wouldn't be possible to conclude if the method is better or not than the usual care.
Answer:
Segunda etapa= 123.75 metros
Step-by-step explanation:
Altura total= 225 metros
<u>En la primera estapa subió el 20% (un quinto):</u>
Primera etapa= 225*0.2= 45 metros
<u>En la tercera etapa subió 25% (un cuarto):</u>
Tercera etapa= 225*0.250 56.25 metros
Ahora debemos determinar cuánto subió en la segunda etapa:
Segunda etapa= altura total - total subido
Segunda etapa= 225 - (45 + 56.25)
Segunda etapa= 123.75 metros
This is = 4 therefore no property is applied
This is a factorial sequence that can be modeled by An = n!. As you may see, the increasing numbers are factorials of 1,2,3,4, and 5. Factorial means multiplying backwards and is represented by !. For example, 1! is 1*1 =1. 2! is 2*1, 3! is 3*2*1, 4! is 4*3*2*1 etc.