Answer:
yes, there is no separation between the administration and ownership in a partnership.
the partnership contract stipulates which partners have the decision making ability and which partners don't. We cannot say specifically that limited partners have no say in decision making.
Moreover, the control of the partnership is not based on the amount invested like in corporations. that too is based on the contract. however, in practice, yes if you have more money invested in the business, you have more influence.
Explanation:
Rational choice theory states that individuals rely on rational calculations to achieve outcomes that are in line with their personal objectives. These decisions provide people with the greatest benefit or satisfaction — given the choices available — and are also in their highest self-interest.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": inefficiencies result when incentives to produce are reduced.
Explanation:
Equity-efficiency tradeoff takes place when attempting to optimize the production efficiency, distribution of wealth is diminished. The concept is always linked to moral philosophy because it implies taking about how people organize themselves in the way to produce and share their goods in a fairly. According to this point of view, when there is not enough motivation to produce inefficiencies arise.
Answer:
Risk is higher if a company has more assets.
Explanation:
All of the following statements are true and correct;
1. Higher financial leverage involves higher risk.
2. Risk is higher if a company has more liabilities.
3. The debt ratio is one measure of financial risk.
4. Lower financial leverage involves lower risk.
However, it is false and an absolutely incorrect to say risk is higher if a company has more assets.
A company having more assets would have a debt ratio less than one (1) because it has many assets to fund it's business. Thus, the company would have little or no debts and as such, it's risk portfolio is very low.
Hence, risk is lower if a company has more assets.
Answer:
$157 per equivalent unit
Explanation:
Note: <em>The full question is attached as picture below</em>
<em />
Conversion cost per equivalent unit = Conversion costs added during February / Equivalent units of conversion costs
Conversion cost per equivalent unit = $1,100,000 / 7000 units
Conversion cost per equivalent unit = $157.14286
Conversion cost per equivalent unit = $157 per equivalent unit
