Answer:
A, C, E
Step-by-step explanation:
Associative
Commutative
Exponent Property
I think that it the correct answer!
Have a great day/night :)
Answer:
The best choice would be hiring a random employee from company A
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Supposing that the performance rating of employees follow approximately a normal distribution on both companies</em>, we are interested in finding what percentage of employees of each company have a performance rating greater than 5.5 (which is the mean of the scale), when we measure them in terms of z-scores.
In order to do that we standardize the scores of both companies with respect to the mean 5.5 of ratings
The z-value corresponding to company A is
where
= mean of company A
= 5.5 (average of rating between 1 and 10)
s = standard deviation of company A
We do the same for company C
This means that 27.49% of employees of company C have a performance rating > 5.5, whereas 71.42% of employees of company B have a performance rating > 5.5.
So, the best choice would be hiring a random employee from company A
"If we are the state champions then we won the game" or C is your answer
Answer:
8:2
32:8
Step-by-step explanation:
It's pretty simple:
If there's 32 boys, which is 4 times the amount you start with, you have to apply that to the number of girls as well since for every 8 boys, there is 2 girls.
8x4
2x4
32:8 Hope this helps
Answer:
Not congruent; not congruent; congruent; congruent; not congruent; not congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
The base of △ABC, BC, is 2 units. The height of △ABC, extending from A to BC, is 3 units. This means that any triangle congruent to this will have a base of 2 and a height of 3.
△MNP has a base of 2; however, its height (from M to NP) is 4 units. Therefore they are not congruent.
△EFG has a base of 2 and a height of 4; it and △ABC are not congruent.
△STU has a base of 2 and a height of 3; it is congruent to △ABC.
△EFG has a base of 2 and a height of 4, just as △MNP; they are congruent.
Since △STU is congruent to △ABC, and we know that △EFG is not congruent to △ABC, we know that △EFG is not congruent to △STU.
Since △MNP is congruent to △EFG, and △EFG is not congruent to △STU, then △MNP is not congruent to △STU.
