1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
1 year ago
10

in the context of proving actual malice in a defamation lawsuit, reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a statement is p

resent when the defendant publishes an article claiming the public figure did a bad thing:
Law
1 answer:
Nookie1986 [14]1 year ago
6 0

Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
True or false - military courts impose the death penalty.
hoa [83]
The answer is false. They can not impose the death penalty
6 0
3 years ago
Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
8.
Karolina [17]
In America we thankfully live in a democracy and therefore no one government or leader etc has absolute power over any other we’re about the majority
6 0
3 years ago
DRIVERS ED : Identify four different paths of travel available to drivers entering roundabout
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer: Yield to drivers in already in the roundabout (on the circulating roadway) Stay in your lane; do not change lanes; Do not stop in the roundabout; Avoid driving next to oversize vehicles.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps

TeenTailor

5 0
2 years ago
Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being consci
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.

Explanation:

Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some jobs for 12 years old can do?!?!?!
    11·1 answer
  • As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguements would you make on their behalf? As an attorney for the government, what
    15·1 answer
  • Grounds on which the registrar of a partnership business may lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    15·1 answer
  • Sarah and Lucia were accepted to the same college. The two women decided to share a house during the school year. They both sign
    8·2 answers
  • Explain the four types of bill​
    13·2 answers
  • Who is currently the president?
    10·2 answers
  • The type of law which deals with an individual's offenses against the state or federal government is called ____ law.
    13·1 answer
  • A particular issue with refugee families is that
    11·1 answer
  • An arrow in this color signals the end to your protected turn period
    9·1 answer
  • What five amendments deal with the presidency and presidential elections?​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!