Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
its strengthens the behavior
Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
Answer:
Give punishments, closure of the account, arresting, banning of sharing, making a wing.
Explanation:
Give punishments to people who commit such type of crime in public, closure of the account of that person, arresting of such type of person by the police department, banning of sharing naked pictures and videos, making a wing for dealing this type of problem in the police department etc are the measures taken in order to stop misuse of the internet, mobile, phones to blackmail and threat others.
