In the voir dire process, attorneys in the case and oftentimes the judge interview prospective jurors to protect the judicial process from jurors who have already made up their mind about the trial.
Attorneys try to dive deeper into the answers given by the jury panel members in their prepared juror questionnaires throughout voir dire.
The objective is to learn more about each person personally and any possible group dynamics.
An integral aspect of a jury trial is voir dire, which is crucial for both the defence and the prosecution.
Efficient voir dire can help choose jurors who will be unbiased and fair as opposed to unjust and biased toward a specific party or the criminal justice system as a whole.
It is obvious that the prosecution and defense have different expectations for the final result of a jury trial.
Nevertheless, the objectives of the voir dire and jury selection processes are largely the same for both parties.
These objectives include starting to:
Learn about specific potential jurors' capacities for objectivity and fairness, as well as for applying the law as directed;
Develop a relationship with the jury and gain their confidence and respect; inform the jurors of the parties' respective theories of the case;
make the attorneys appear to the jury to be devoted, diligent, and trustworthy individuals.
To know more about voir dire, visit:
brainly.com/question/14040207
#SPJ4
