Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
Answer:
Hadith is a form of Islamic tradition recorded in oral sources. A hadith is usually a short and out of context account of what Muhammad said or did. Usually its purpose was to confirm something in accordance with the law of God. Together, the hadiths form the sunnah, the most important source of Muslim morality and law after the Qur'an. Initially, they were passed on orally through the chain of messengers. According to the traditional view of Muslim scholars, this contributed to the creation of many false hadiths, which were to support the interests of individual groups, and by about 200 years after the prophet's death, there were already around 200,000 Arab scholars therefore proceeded to a careful study of these messages, checking the chain of transmitters of each hadith. On the basis of this research, they created collections of hadiths believed to be authentic.
The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.
- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.
- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).
To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :
brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
