1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
3 years ago
14

it is your sister's birthday and you are preparing a family meal. The joint of meat needs to be cooked for 30 minutes per 500 g

plus an extra 20 minutes. How long will it take to cook a joint of meat weighing 2.5 kilograms?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
5 0
1 kg = 1000 g....so 2.5 kg = (2.5 * 1000) = 2500 grams

it cooks 30 minutes per 500 g.....2500/500 = 5...so there are 5 thirty minute periods ....(5 * 30) = 150 minutes....plus the extra 20 minutes....(150 + 20) = 170 minutes....so ur looking at 2 hrs 50 minutes cook time <=
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ME!!! WHOEVER HELPS ME AND GETS IT RIGHT WILL GET BRAINIEST!!!
Kamila [148]
(0,6) is the correct answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ruben sees 14 wheels on a total of 6 bicycles and tricycles. How many bicycles and tricycles are there?
Rina8888 [55]
4 bicycles 2 tricycles 
4  (bicycles)times 2(number of wheels on each bicycle) = 8
2 (bike) time 3 (number of wheels on each) = 6
8+6=14 

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(x+y=3<br> (3x+2y=14<br> what is the coordinates for this problem
Ludmilka [50]


<span>3x - 2y + 2y > -14 + 2y </span>

<span>3x + 0 > -14 + 2y </span>

<span>3x > -14 + 2y </span>

<span>3x + 14 > -14 + 14 + 2y </span>

<span>3x + 14 > 0 + 2y </span>

<span>3x + 14 > 2y </span>

<span>(3x + 14)/2 > 2y/2 </span>

<span>(3x + 14)/2 > y*(2/2) </span>

<span>(3x + 14)/2 > y*(1) </span>

<span>(3x + 14)/2 > y </span>

<span>y < (3x + 14)/2 </span>

<span>y < 3x/2 + 14/2 </span>

<span>y < 3x/2 + 7 </span>

<span>y < (3/2)*x + 7 </span>

<span>“y” is LESS THAN (3/2)*x + 7 </span>

<span>the slope intercept form of the inequality is: y < (3/2)*x + 7 </span>


<span>STEP 2: Temporarily change the inequality into an equation by replacing the < symbol with an = symbol. </span>

<span>y < (3/2)*x + 7 </span>

<span>y = (3/2)*x + 7 </span>


<span>STEP 3: Prepare the x-y table using the equation from Step 2. </span>

<span>Using the slope intercept form of the equation from Step 2, choose a value for x, and then compute y for at least three points. </span>

<span>Although you could plot the graph with just two sets of x-y coordinates, you should compute at least three different sets of coordinates points to ensure you have not made a mistake. All three x-y coordinates must lie on the same straight line. If they do not, you have made a mistake. </span>

<span>You can choose any value for x. </span>


<span>For example, (arbitrarily) choose x = -2 </span>

<span>If x = -2, </span>

<span>y = (3/2)*x + 7 </span>

<span>y = (3/2)*(-2) + 7 </span>

<span>y = 4 </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Eva works as a salesperson at an electronics store and sells phones and phone accessories. Eva earns a $8 commission for every p
adoni [48]

Answer:

Hope this helps out dude!

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
q(x)= x 2 −6x+9 x 2 −8x+15 ​ q, left parenthesis, x, right parenthesis, equals, start fraction, x, squared, minus, 8, x, plus, 1
AURORKA [14]

According to the theory of <em>rational</em> functions, there are no <em>vertical</em> asymptotes at the <em>rational</em> function evaluated at x = 3.

<h3>What is the behavior of a functions close to one its vertical asymptotes?</h3>

Herein we know that the <em>rational</em> function is q(x) = (x² - 6 · x + 9) / (x² - 8 · x + 15), there are <em>vertical</em> asymptotes for values of x such that the denominator becomes zero. First, we factor both numerator and denominator of the equation to see <em>evitable</em> and <em>non-evitable</em> discontinuities:

q(x) = (x² - 6 · x + 9) / (x² - 8 · x + 15)

q(x) = [(x - 3)²] / [(x - 3) · (x - 5)]

q(x) = (x - 3) / (x - 5)

There are one <em>evitable</em> discontinuity and one <em>non-evitable</em> discontinuity. According to the theory of <em>rational</em> functions, there are no <em>vertical</em> asymptotes at the <em>rational</em> function evaluated at x = 3.

To learn more on rational functions: brainly.com/question/27914791

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Need help thank you!
    11·1 answer
  • Could someone help out ? thanks
    6·1 answer
  • What is the value of X?
    8·1 answer
  • The histogram represents the distributions of boiling temperatures, in degrees Celsius, of tap water and a mixture of salt water
    5·1 answer
  • A rigid transformation can also be referred to as an
    11·2 answers
  • Hey, does anyone have any questions that they need answered? I'll answer any that you have if I know them, I promise not to stea
    13·2 answers
  • I'm running low on points can you please help me :) I will give brainiest promise
    12·2 answers
  • Please HELP ASAP 31 points on
    12·1 answer
  • X + y = 5 2x - y = -3
    10·1 answer
  • What is the greatest common prime factor of 24 and 32?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!