Scientific knowledge can be modified. This is because all the scientific principles that are existing now is not certain for all possible conditions. Scientific knowledge is not directly given to us, human minds work the effort of unveiling the unknown. Thus, scientists are slowly discovering the science of all natural phenomena. Along the way, they could come up with misinterpretations. Let me give a concrete example. When J.J. Thompson proposed the Plum-Pudding model, it was the widely accepted theory in the field of atomic science. However, when Rutherford did his golden foil experiment, he disproved Thompson's model and proposed the Planetary Model. Therefore, scientific knowledge is an ongoing process. Scientists would always want to disprove each other, not because they want to compete with each other. They want to discover the truth together with what they have to the best of their abilities. They are never content with just one simple principle according to one scientist. It will always be verified by a group of fellow scientists.
In the 21st century where technology is exponentially progressing, scientists would discover more of the basic principles. Hence, we would expect that scientific knowledge is constantly changing and modifying.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Each person has two alleles (forms of a gene) for a characteristic. We can represent them using letters.
Dominant trait are written as capitals. If a dominant allele is present in someone's genotype, the dominant trait will show.
The recessive trait only shows if a person has two recessive alleles.
Brown eyes is a dominant trait, and blue eyes is a recessive trait.
B = dominant brown eyes
b = recessive blue eyes
If someone has <u>brown</u> eyes, their genotype can be:
BB
Bb
If someone has blue eyes, their genotype is:
bb
The baby's genotype must be bb because it has blue eyes. <u>The baby gets one allele from each parent</u>.
See the photo for Punnett square. If the parents are both Bb, then they could each give the b allele, resulting in a blue-eyed baby.
Answer:
1. A
2. B or C
Explanation:
1.
F=ma, meaning that if you use two times more force on a constant mass, the acceleration must double. Acceleration is change in velocity, which means that if you are aiming for the same final velocity the change must happen in half of the time. Therefore, the correct answer is choice A.
2.
By Newton's first law, an object in motion will stay in motion unless an external force acts on it. Since there is nothing pushing the puck in the other direction, the puck will either keep on going for at a constant velocity or will reduce its speed gradually, depending on whether or not this ice is considered to be frictionless. Hope this helps!
<h3>formula of speed is distance/time</h3><h3>so</h3><h2>140/2.5</h2><h2>= 56</h2><h2>the answer should be </h2><h2>56 km/h</h2>
Answer:
a) Y component of the vector =15.54 m
b) Vector magnitude = 21.6 m
Explanation:
The given vector makes 44 degree angle with Y axis, as given. This is same as 90 -44 = 46 degrees with the horizontal or X axis.
b) X component of the given vector = 
= A cos 46 =15
⇒ A = 15/cos 16 = 21.6 m = Total vector magnitude.
a) Y component of the vector = 21.6 sin 46 = 15.54 m
b) A = 21.6 m
