~ DHS has just established a new agency to fight cyber threats
!
~ DHS provides security at the Super Bowl!
~ When DHS was created, not everyone was impressed by its name.
~ DHS is the third-largest Cabinet department!
~ The coast guard is the largest agency within the DHS!
Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
Answer:
State Circuit Court.
This is because speed driving or driving above the speed limit is a minor offence that need not be dealt in a federal, higher court and can be easily taken care of by the lower state courts.
Explanation:
The State Circuit Court is an intermediate level court where local and limited jurisdiction cases are heard. These courts are the court systems that deal with cases that are not serious enough to be tried in the higher courts. They are also known as state courts.
In the scenario of being pulled over at the interstate by a state highway patrol car for speed driving or driving above the limit, the summons will be heard in a circuit court. This is because the case is just a minor one as compared to more serious offenses, which makes it eligible to be tried in a lower court rather than at the federal level.
Answer Some signs of impaired drivers are improper lane use, failure to signal, or unpredictable stopping and swerving of the car. These are just some of the signs that a driver may be impaired if you do see these signs on the road try to keep as much space possible between you and the car who demonstrates these signs.
Explanation:
Answer:
A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.
In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.
Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.
