1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
1 year ago
13

An oral contract for $300 item is enforceable True or false

Law
2 answers:
aliya0001 [1]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

If both parties agree to the contract, they both have to keep their end of the deal.

Pls mark brainliest

Alex1 year ago
5 0

It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.

<h3>Can you enforce a verbal contract?</h3>

As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.

<h3>Is an oral agreement still binding?</h3>

A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.

Learn more about oral contract: brainly.com/question/15104947

#SPJ13

You might be interested in
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
The Federal government allows a tax advantage for
yanalaym [24]
D all of the above !!!!!!!!
3 0
2 years ago
Although a nolo contendere plea may lead to a judicial determination of guilt, it is inadmissible in later civil cases against t
Orlov [11]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This statement correctly identifies a characteristic of the <em>nolo contendere</em> plea. This is a legal term that expresses the desire to not contend. Therefore, this is also known as a plea of no contest. This is considered a plea in which the defendant neither admits nor disputes a charge. This may lead to a determination of guilt, but it is inadmissible in later civil cases against the defendant based on the same conduct amounting to the criminal violation.

4 0
3 years ago
This ones really confusing me whos more suspicions Steve or Alex from mine and craft
Fantom [35]
Steve ong no cap no kizzie
6 0
2 years ago
4. Which factor doesn't affect the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC)?
KATRIN_1 [288]
D. How physically fit you are
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me?!?!?! This is due in 15 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Will mark Brainliest!)
    7·2 answers
  • QUESTION 9
    13·1 answer
  • What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • O que influencia a moda adolescente
    14·1 answer
  • Using the event of the Columbine Shootings of 1997: You must state what actions the local government, state government, and fede
    8·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE ANSWER THIS AND NOT MAKE IT TOO SMART MY TEACHER DOESNT EXPECT A LOT FROM ME
    8·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • Free<br> free<br> free<br> free<br> free<br> free<br> free
    8·2 answers
  • This has nothing to do with school but I want to go to the boywithuke concert on may 12 and it says 16+ can I (13) go with a leg
    10·1 answer
  • Why do some states leave it up to cities and counties to determine requirements for private security guards?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!