1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
1 year ago
13

An oral contract for $300 item is enforceable True or false

Law
2 answers:
aliya0001 [1]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

If both parties agree to the contract, they both have to keep their end of the deal.

Pls mark brainliest

Alex1 year ago
5 0

It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.

<h3>Can you enforce a verbal contract?</h3>

As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.

<h3>Is an oral agreement still binding?</h3>

A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.

Learn more about oral contract: brainly.com/question/15104947

#SPJ13

You might be interested in
Instructions: As you read each task card, identify whether the task card is describing a ‘law' or a ‘theory.' The first one is d
Feliz [49]

Hello. You have not shown the cards to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for this to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

Theories are statements that seek to explain some phenomena in nature, but do not give a certainty that this is correct. Thus, a theory is a form of explanation that is open to reformulation because it does not present an absolute truth. A law, however, presents a concrete statement, completely proven and that is not intended to explain a phenomenon, but rather to expose generalized information on the subject addressed.

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP
Bas_tet [7]
No
republican super majority
lobbying
many times people in government vote for something because their allies are voting for it/they feel pressured
5 0
3 years ago
What is the main characteristic pf a rubuttable presumption?​
matrenka [14]

Answer:

A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain what you would do to minimize the tailgating hazard
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

uh make a left? I'm not sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the politico legal environment for Bangladesh?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

Politics of Bangladesh takes place in a framework of a parliamentary representative democratic republic, whereby the Prime Minister of Bangladesh is the head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you think anything from your vehicle check could affect your safety or ability to control your car, you should _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Members of the House of Representatives are elected by different states on the basis of their population at thoug members of the
    8·2 answers
  • Edna is a leading brain surgeon in the United States. She enters into a contract to perform a complicated brain surgery on Ben.
    15·1 answer
  • Diferencie preclusão lógica do venire contra factum proprio.
    13·1 answer
  • how much proof is necessary for a criminal trial? how is this different from the amount of proof necessary in a civil trial?​
    5·2 answers
  • Blocos econômmicos<br>ਹ<br>Vertical<br>ge​
    10·1 answer
  • Which is the right answer?
    8·1 answer
  • During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he wa
    5·1 answer
  • A restriction on commercial speech that does not implement a substantial
    6·1 answer
  • Crum Brothers Corp., a steel drum manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant in Pittsburg, Penn.. Coel Stone, the pl
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!