1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
1 year ago
13

An oral contract for $300 item is enforceable True or false

Law
2 answers:
aliya0001 [1]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

If both parties agree to the contract, they both have to keep their end of the deal.

Pls mark brainliest

Alex1 year ago
5 0

It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.

<h3>Can you enforce a verbal contract?</h3>

As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.

<h3>Is an oral agreement still binding?</h3>

A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.

Learn more about oral contract: brainly.com/question/15104947

#SPJ13

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELPPP , IM SO LOST THE QUESTIONS ARE ABOVE . ANYTHING HELPS
Vikki [24]
Just look it up and write it out

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly
serg [7]

Answer:

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states

7 0
3 years ago
List the people involved in Carmela Coppilino’s death. Why is there a possible problem with her death certificate?
omeli [17]

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
Which element of crime relates to the intent behind committing it?
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Mens rea refers to the crimes mental elements of the defendants intent.

The criminal act must be voluntary or purposeful.

3 0
3 years ago
A. What are the safety steps to follow when changing lanes?
qaws [65]

Explanation:

A)

1)Turn on your signal.

2)Check your mirrors.

3)Check your blind spot by looking over your shoulder.

4)If it is safe, change lanes.

5)Turn off your signal after completing the lane change.

B)

1)Scan for hazards, e.g., oncoming vehicles, vehicles approaching from rear, merging vehicles;

2)Check for blind spots;

3)Signal your intention and accelerate into passing lane;

4)Accelerate quickly to an appropriate speed;

5)Concentrate on the path ahead;

6)Check the mirror for following cars.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true regarding privacy rights?a. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that the U.S. Constitution does not p
    9·1 answer
  • Which founding document was a fundamental guarantee of rights and privileges for the noble class of England.
    9·1 answer
  • The crime scene investigation team arrives at a car crash scene and finds that both the drivers are taken away in an ambulance a
    7·1 answer
  • Many of the results of the National Crime Victimization Survey are found in the Publications and Products section. There you wil
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER FOR ME AND I WILL MARK YOU BRANLIEST WHOEVER ANSWER FIRST AND CORRECT
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the relationship between CSR policies and
    14·2 answers
  • An individual can be tried for assault and battery in both a criminal court and a civil court.
    11·1 answer
  • What English documents helped established the American Colonies system of Government and explain what was taken from each?
    6·1 answer
  • Question 1. Discuss the sentencing models of indeterminate, and determinate?
    14·1 answer
  • In Missouri, the insurer must keep a copy of all replacement documents for what period of time?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!