What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
Answer: ACLU: Supreme Court Maintains Ban on Censorship Law. The ACLU welcomed a federal appeals court ruling that a law meant to safeguard children against Internet porxxn would block lawful and valuable speech for adults.
Explanation:
Answer:
to treat someone or something in an unfair way they did her a grave ijustice is by not allowing her to file complaint
Answer:
I have no idea
Explanation:
I wish I could help though
Law and morality are two normative systems that control and regulate behaviors in a human community so as to allow harmonious and effective intersubjectivity between individuals who recognize one another as bearers of rights. The values of any society are its own law. One of the purpoess of law is to provide a list of "norms" which constitute obligatory rules of behavior for the members of the society. These legal norms are closely related to various social values, being either a direct expression of them or serving them in a more indirect way.
