Answer:
not just pay them they can award them with extra credit?
Explanation:
You must consider both consequences, the positive and the negative. Then you must think of a way that you will have a win-win situation or just do the compromising to be able to solve the problem and have a faster solving process.
Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) They have the opportunity to reject the proposed change.
b) They will have the opportunity to know more than others about the change.
c) They will be able to convince customers the change was the right thing to do.
d) They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
And the correct answer is the option D: They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
Explanation:
To begin with, it will be more acceptable for an employee of a company or a member of a group to agree with a change if that person was involved in the planning of the change. That means that he will feel that he is part of the solution and therefore part of the team because his ideas were listened and maybe he contributed with something. That is why that members who participate in the planning of a change will always be more positive about the final outcome due to the fact that they were there during the process of deciding that outcome and that will make them feel integrity related to the work and to the team as well.
Answer:
Unlimited Liability
Explanation:
Jason, Jeanette, and their eight other friends are forming an unlimited liability corporation, which exist in a few Canadian provinces (Alberta, Nova Scotia, and British Columbia).
In unlimited liablity corporations, as the name implies, partners have unlimited liability in case of bankruptcy or default. This means that if the company fails, partners do not only provide their capital contributions, but also their personal wealth. (for example, their houses, cars, appliances, etc).
