Answer:
King Philip II
He had loved portraits. During his reign, Philip II created a golden age for the arts at that time. He asked for self-portraits and portraits of his many wives to reinforce his authority to the Spain people.
Louis XIV
Louis was a very controversial king because he used to care more for the arts than for the government matters. In contrast with Philip II, Louis's interests were focalized in the architectural legacy. One of his many masterpieces is the Champs-Élysées boulevard in Paris, France.
Answer:
It plays an important role.
Explanation:
Constitution of Nepal has empowered Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA) to investigate cases against the government officers holding any public office and their associates who are involved in corruption. The CIAA played a very important role in the country last year by filed 88 per cent of cases at the Special Court against government officials.
Symptoms associated with dementia usually develop within a few hours or days is a false statement.
<h3>What is dementia?</h3>
Dementia is a phrase that refers to a set of symptoms that impact your memory, reasoning, and social abilities.
Dementia isn't caused by a single disease, but it can be caused by a number of them.
Memory loss is a common symptom of dementia, but it can be caused by a variety of factors.
Thus, the given statement is false.
Learn more about dementia
brainly.com/question/14345567
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
The north was heavily dependent on industry while the south was dependent on agriculture. The southern economy was based on the free work they were getting from slaves the north did not need slaves as they were less dependent on agriculture
