A mortgage originator convincing an appraiser to grow the valuation on a home that the originator's buddy is trying to shop for is an instance of Fraud For profit.
An appraiser is someone who makes use of their analytical capabilities to assess and assign value to a product, piece of machinery, intellectual assets, actual property, or industrial entity.
An appraiser is an expert who determines the market price of an asset which includes rings, art, gems, circle of relatives' heirlooms, and real property. All appraisers need to act independently of the shopping for and selling events, and their critiques need to be independent. Appraisers take a look at the scale, form, and topography of the lot, which includes easements and encroachments. The appraiser will even note amenities consisting of avenue utilities and vehicular get admission. a part of the evaluation technique includes an opinion of whether or not the house's characteristics are like-minded with the market.
Learn more about appraisers here:
brainly.com/question/7595736
#SPJ4
Answer: The economy drastically slows down as money loses its buying power.
Explanation:
Explanation:
I would say may 6th because Sam didn't know Ralph was going to revoke until May 5th and that only makes it half final because Ralph wouldn't know in anyway except through a letter that Sam has received his letter and agreed or disagreed.
May 6th is when he gets the confirmation. So both people know on May 6th.
If this is too confusing ( like it was for me I had to read it 6 times ) then think about it this way. if you make a deal with a fisherman to buy fish on Wednesday and you send him a lettering sunday that arrives a day later, the fisherman won't know until a day later (Monday) and on that day he receives it you don't know if he got it. That's why it's half official. when he send a letter that arrives the day after he got your letter (tuesday) then you know that he understood you won't make it on Wednesday making it fully official.
does this make sense? if so hope it helps.
Answer:
Supplier's quotation (2,400 x $6.25) 150,000
Less: Relevant cost of production:
Direct material (2,400 x $31) 74,400
Direct labour (2,400 x $18) 43,200
Variable overhead (2,400 x $9) <u>21,600</u> <u>139,200</u>
Savings <u> 10,800</u>
The parts should be produced in-house since the relevant cost of production is lower than supplier's quotation.
Explanation:
In this case, we need to compare supplier's quotation to the relevant cost of production. The price of $6.25 above was computed by dividing the total price charged by the supplier by the number of parts. Moreso, the relevant cost of production is obtained by the aggregate of direct material, direct labour and variable overhead.