The solutions for ‘x’ are 2 and -5
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Given equation:

Since the base on both sides as ‘12’ are the same, we can write it as



Often, the value of x is easiest to solve by
by factoring a square factor, setting each factor to zero, and then isolating each factor. Whereas sometimes the equation is too awkward or doesn't matter at all, or you just don't feel like factoring.
<u>The Quadratic Formula:</u> For
, the values of x which are the solutions of the equation are given by:

Where, a = 1, b = 3 and c = -10



So, the solutions for ‘x’ are


The solutions for ‘x’ are 2 and -5
Answer:
HERES YOUR ASSIGNMENT! I EDITED IT ON MICROSOFT SO THAT I CAN SCREENSHOT IT AND SEND IT TO YOU...I HOPE IT HELPS :)
<h3>ARIGATO OZAIMASU!!!</h3>
Answer:
f=
1
/4
y+
−1
/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's solve for f.
y=5x^0+4x−3
Step 1: Flip the equation.
4x+2=y
Step 2: Add -2 to both sides.
4x+2+−2=y+−2
4x=y−2
Step 3: Divide both sides by 4.
4x
/4
=
y−2
/4
x=
1
/4
y+
−1
/2
=f=
1
/4
y+
−1
/2
<h3><em><u>brainliest please?</u></em></h3>
Answer:
For mileages higher than 80 miles Company A will charge less than Company B
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we have to write an inequality:
Company A charges $111 and allows unlimited mileage.
Company A =111
Company B has an initial fee of $55 and charges an additional $0.70 for every mile driven
Company B = 55+0.70m
Where m is the number of miles.
Company A has to charge less than Company B
a<b
111 < 55+0.70m
Solving for m
111-55 < 0.70 m
56 < 0.70m
56/0.70 < m
80 < m
For mileages higher than 80 miles Company A will charge less than Company B
Answer:
x = 11°
Step-by-step explanation:
The parallel lines suggest we look to the relationships involving angles and transversals. The angle marked 33° and ∠CAB are alternate interior angles, hence congruent:
∠CAB = 33°
5x is the measure of the external angle opposite that internal angle and angle 2x of ΔABC, so it is equal to their sum:
5x = 2x + 33°
3x = 33° . . . . . . . . . subtract 2x
x = 11° . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 3