Ask question

Ask question

All categories

1 year ago

12

Create a matrix that is equal to F+G. The first matrix below is named F and the second matrix below is named G. Name the new mat

rix with the answers in it H. Then answer the following question. What is the element at address h31 Round answer to the tenths place.

1 answer:

likoan [24]1 year ago

8 0

F+G:

$F+G=\begin{bmatrix}{-1.8} & {-8.6} & {} \\ {2.85} & {-1.4} & {} \\ {-1.8} & {5.1} & {}\end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix}{1.32} & {-1.9} & {} \\ {2.25} & {0.0} & {} \\ {-6.2} & {1.4} & {}\end{bmatrix}$

Then, add the elements that occupy the same position:

$H=\begin{bmatrix}{-1.8+1.32} & {-8.6+(-1.9)} & {} \\ {2.85+2.25} & {-1.4+0.0} & {} \\ {-1.8+(-6.2)} & {5.1+1.4} & {}\end{bmatrix}$

Solve

$H=\begin{bmatrix}{-0.48} & {-10.5} & {} \\ {5.1} & {-1.4} & {} \\ {-8} & {6.5} & {}\end{bmatrix}$

So, we find the element at address h31:

$H=\begin{bmatrix}{h11} & {h12} & {} \\ {h21} & {h22} & {} \\ {h31} & {h32} & {}\end{bmatrix}$

In this case, position h31 is - 8.0

You might be interested in

What is an integer?

Digiron [165]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

An integer is any whole number (both positive and negative) and zero.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that is inscribed in a sphere of radius r.

zvonat [6]

Answer:

The maximum volume of a box inscribed in a sphere of radius r is a cube with volume $\frac{8r^3}{3\sqrt{3}}$ .

Step-by-step explanation:

This is an optimization problem; that means that given the constraints on the problem, the answer must be found without assuming any shape of the box. That feat is made through the power of derivatives, in which all possible shapes are analyzed in its equation and the biggest -or smallest, given the case- answer is obtained. Now, 'common sense' tells us that the shape that can contain more volume is a symmetrical one, that is, a cube. In this case common sense is correct, and the assumption can save lots of calculations, however, mathematics has also shown us that sometimes 'common sense' fails us and the answer can be quite unintuitive. Therefore, it is best not to assume any shape, and that's how it will be solved here.

The first step of solving a mathematics problem (after understanding the problem, of course) is to write down the known information and variables, and make a picture if possible.

The equation of a sphere of radius $r$ is $x^2 + y^2 + z^2=r^2$ . Where $x$ , $y$ and $z$ are the distances from the center of the sphere to any of its points in the border. Notice that this is the three-dimensional version of Pythagoras' theorem, and it means that a sphere is the collection of coordinates in which the equation holds for a given radius, and that you can treat this spherical problem in cartesian coordinates.

A box that touches its corners with the sphere with arbitrary side lenghts is drawn, and the distances from the center of the sphere -which is also the center of the box- to each cartesian axis are named $x$ , $y$ and $z$ ; then, the complete sides of the box are measured $2x$ , $2y$ and $2z$ . The volume $V$ of any rectangular box is given by the product of its sides, that is, $V=2x\cdot 2y\cdot 2z=8xyz$ .

Those are the two equations that bound the problem. The idea is to optimize $V$ in terms of $r$ , therefore the radius of the sphere must be introduced into the equation of the volumen of the box so that both variables are correlated. From the equation of the sphere one of the variables is isolated: $z^2=r^2-x^2 - y^2\quad \Rightarrow z= \sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}$ , so it can be replaced into the other: $V=8xy\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}$ .

But there are still two coordinate variables that are not fixed and cannot be replaced or assumed. This is the point in which optimization kicks in through derivatives. In this case, we have a cube in which every cartesian coordinate is independent from each other, so a partial derivative is applied to each coordinate independently, and then the answer from both coordiantes is merged into a single equation and it will hopefully solve the problem.

The $x$ coordinate is treated first: $\frac{\partial V}{\partial x} =\frac{\partial 8xy\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}}{\partial x}$ , in a partial derivative the other variable(s) is(are) treated as constant(s), therefore the product rule is applied: $\frac{\partial V}{\partial x} = 8y\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2} + 8xy \frac{(r^2-x^2 - y^2)^{-1/2}}{2} (-2x)$ (careful with the chain rule) and now the expression is reorganized so that a common denominator is found $\frac{\partial V)}{\partial x} = \frac{8y(r^2-x^2 - y^2)}{\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}} - \frac{8x^2y }{\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}} = \frac{8y(r^2-2x^2 - y^2)}{\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}}$ .

Since it cannot be simplified any further it is left like that and it is proceed to optimize the other variable, the coordinate $y$ . The process is symmetrical due to the equivalence of both terms in the volume equation. Thus, $\frac{\partial V}{\partial y} = \frac{8x(r^2-x^2 - 2y^2)}{\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}}$ .

The final step is to set both partial derivatives equal to zero, and that represents the value for $x$ and $y$ which sets the volume $V$ to its maximum possible value.

$\frac{\partial V}{\partial x} = \frac{8y(r^2-2x^2 - y^2)}{\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}} =0 \quad\Rightarrow r^2-2x^2 - y^2=0$ so that the non-trivial answer is selected, then $r^2=2x^2+ y^2$ . Similarly, from the other variable it is obtained that $r^2=x^2+2 y^2$ . The last equation is multiplied by two and then it is substracted from the first, $r^2=3 y^2\therefore y=\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}$ . Similarly, $x=\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}$ .

Steps must be retraced to the volume equation $V=8xy\sqrt{r^2-x^2 - y^2}=8\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}\sqrt{r^2-\left(\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{r}{\sqrt{3}}\right)^2}=8\frac{r^2}{3}\sqrt{r^2-\frac{r^2}{3} - \frac{r^2}{3}} =8\frac{r^2}{3}\sqrt{\frac{r^2}{3}}=8\frac{r^3}{3\sqrt{3}}$ .

6 0

3 years ago

An angle that is greater then 90 degrees and less then 180degrees

salantis [7]

It would be an obtuse angle :)

4 0

3 years ago

When Mrs. Stewart makes pie dough, she uses 2/3 cup of shortening for every 2 1/2 cups of flour which proportion could be used t

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

The amount of flour Mrs.Stewart needs for 5 cups of shortening $=\frac{75}{4} =18\tfrac{3}{4}$ cups.

Step-by-step explanation:

Mrs.Stewart pie dough needs $\frac{2}{3}$ cups of shortening for $2\tfrac{1}{2}=\frac{5}{2}$ cups of flour.

Now we assume that the shortening needed for $x$ cups of flour is $y$ cups.

Accordingly we can arrange the ratios.

So for one cup of shortening how many cups of flour is needed we have to use the unitary method:

$\frac{cups\ of flour\ (x)}{cups\ of\ shortening\ (y)} =\frac{x}{y} =\frac{5/2}{2/3}$

Plugging the value of $y=5$ as it is number of cups of shortening Mrs.Stewart have used.

And multiplying both sides with $5$ .

Number of cups of flour needed when $5$ cups of shortenings are used $(x) =\frac{x}{y} =\frac{5/2}{2/3}$ .

So, $(x)=\frac{5\times 3\times 5}{2\times 2} =\frac{75}{4} = 18\tfrac{3}{4}$

The amount of floor Mrs.Stewart needed for $5$ cups of shortening $= 18\tfrac{3}{4}\$ cups of floor.

3 0

3 years ago

Make word problem for 6,8 4,8

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

sorry this is for the points

4 0

3 years ago