Answer:
The given claim: "The good depends on the results of what you do." which refers to the concept of Consequentialism.
Explanation:
Consequentialism:
It is such a philosophy that is based on the following principles:
- The act may be considered good or bad depending upon its good or bad results.
- The more good results an act produce, the more right will be the act.
- The problem with the given claim is that the person who follow this theory can say that: It is good to murder a X person as this X person is dangerous for some 50 people. Because this act of murdering is giving relief to 50 people so the murder of a single person is justifiable.
I don’t think anyone is gonna write 3 paragraphs for 5 points, but goodluck hunting
In pre-modern societies, status differentiation is widely varied. In some cases it can be quite rigid and class based, such as with the Indian caste<span> system. </span><span>In contrast to modern societies, a person’s lifelong position in most premodern societies was mostly determined by the caste he/she belongs.</span>
A: The first one is inherent powers. The Post Office is mentioned in Article 1 Section 8 and is the 7th clause down right in the constitution. It is a right given to the Federal Government to set up Post Offices.
B: The second one also comes from Article 1 Section 8. It is called the Elastic Clause and it allows the Federal Government to to add laws so it can carry out its duties. It is the last clause of Article 1 section 8. Things like highways and borders come under this clause. The answer is 4. Implied Powers.
C: Actually C is granted by the Constitution. Defense must be given to some governing body. This too is Article 1 Section 8. It is in the very first clause. Since it is in the constitution, the right is inherent. Two answers that are the same makes me very nervous, but when something is in the constitution there is no choice but to pick it as an inherent right.
D: Both state and federal governments can tax. These are concurrent powers.
E: The constitution prohibits any law that would show bias or support to an established religion. It is a denied power. This is straight out of Amendment 1.
What these 4 things have in common is they are all religions. People from around the world believe in different religions.