Answer:
operational feasibility
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of operational feasibility. This term refers to the ability for an individual to be able to complete the requirements of a certain operation/task. Which is what Lara is doing in this situation, she is making sure that her team can handle this project because if they accept it and cannot complete it then the company looks really bad and it hurts their reputation.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
According to Freud, this is Reaction Formation.
Another example can serve men that are prejudice against homosexuals are actually making a defense against their own homosexual feelings.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, Powers and duties of the United States Government are divided among the three branches of government.
Explanation:
Separation of powers means that the duties of government are divided among different parts of the Government. The purpose of this system is to make sure that power is not held by the central government only and is properly distributed among all the branches to serve all aspects of the society.
In the US system, there are three branches of federal government between which the power exists. The Executive Branch is the president and their staff including the Cabinet. The Legislative Branch is the two houses of Congress: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The third branch is the Court with the Supreme Court at the head and district level courts throughout the country.
Each branch has separate roles and each branch can check the power of other one.
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder I believe
In the 1990s and the first two decades of the 2000s, investors from the Asian economies of Japan and China made significant direct and portfolio investments in the United States. At the time, many Americans were unhappy that this investment was occurring.It was better for the United States not to receive this foreign investment because it shrank the capital stock: False
It will be better for the United State to receive this foreign investment than not to receive it because it will made the capital stock larger and this will benefit the government because there will be a return on the investment itself.
It's best for Americans that China and Japan, rather than Americans themselves, made the investment because Americans could receive the returns on the investment made by China and Japan.True
It is best for Americans to have made this investment because then they would have received the return on the investment themselves.
