<span>Psychoanalysis can be used here. Psychoanalysis is a set of theories and
therapeutic techniques connected to the study of the unconscious mind, which
together form a process of treatment for mental-health disorders. </span>The basic views
of psychoanalysis include:
<span>- a
person's growth is determined by frequently forgotten events in early
childhood, rather than by inherited traits alone;
- human
behavior and cognition are mainly determined by unreasonable
drives that are deep-rooted in the unconscious;
<span>- efforts
to bring those drives into consciousness triggers resistance in the form
of defense mechanisms, chiefly repression;
</span><span>- conflicts
between conscious and unconscious material can effect in mental disturbances for instance anxiety and depression;
</span><span>- unconscious
material can start in dreams and unintentional
acts, comprising mannerisms and slips
of the tongue;</span>
</span>
Answer:
Due to lack of technology.
Explanation:
It took several centuries before the civilizations of the two hemispheres had communication because of lack of technologies that can make a bridge of communication between two hemisphere. People are not interested in research and having old wrong beliefs that prevent them from growth and development but due to renaissance movement people get rid of false and wrong beliefs and work for the advancement of technology which leads to communication between two hemisphere.
Answer:
availability heuristic
Explanation:
Availability heuristic: The term availability heuristic is defined as an individual's mental shortcut that depends on the sudden examples came to his or her mind while evaluating a particular concept, decision, topic, or method.
In other words, the availability heuristic refers to the process of an individual making a decision based on their mental shortcut that helps him or her to bring something into conscious mind easily.
In the question above, the lottery promoters are most clearly exploiting the influence of availability heuristic.
I believe the answer is D) 158. Thanks
He didnt think the US should tie themselves to any European power.
issues could come about if England wanted to get involved in any territories.
if they sided with one Britian it Would be directly hypocritical of their practice and staement about being free from European affairs being seperate entities.it would go against their statement of being independent from foreign affairs
