Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
9-7 = 2 (-2)
1-3 = -2
-2/-2 = 1
Answer:
33
Step-by-step explanation:
So the angle of 40 is a vertical angle with the one opposite of it, meaning that the triangle on the left would have two values of 40 and 41, to find the value of the 3rd angle of the left triangle, you can subtract 40 and 41 from 180 which is the total number of degrees in a triangle to get 99, then you can find the degrees of the triangle on the right's bottom angle by subtracting 99 from 180, meaning the bottom left angle would be 81, then you can do the same to find the other angle by subtracting 114 from 180 to get 66. Lastly you can add 81 and 66 to get 147, then subtracting 147 from 180 you would get x=33
Answer:
.2 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the width be x feet.
Therefore, length = 2x - 10
Perimeter of rectangle = 52
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.