Answer:
look i need help on the smae thing so sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Answer:
solution is given below
Step-by-step explanation:
A simple random sample size n = 250 . Of the 250 employed individuals surveyed,42 responded that they did work at home at least once per week.
Construct 99% confidence interval for population
For proportion : 42 / 250 = 1/10 = 0.16
Mean = 2.5 * sqrt [ 0.1 * 0.9 / 250]
= 2.5 * 0.01
= 0.47
Construction of hypothesis:
0.10 - 0.047 < p < 0.10 + 0.047
Answer:
A. They have the same end behavior as x approaches [Infinity], but they have different x- and y- intercepts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The x and y intercepts in mathematics can depict more than one function. They can have same end behavior as x approach. The x and y intercepts can be different for the two functions.
Answer:
not visible....
Step-by-step explanation:
sssssss
