Answer:
In my opinion, they didn't.
Explanation:
The "Indian Removal" refers to a time period when a lot of native American people were forced to get out from their ancestral homes. The reason for this was because the US government wanted to obtain control over the natural resources that exist within these lands. In return, they gave the Native American people with a set of land that they called "Reservation".
But, the value of the reservation land was nothing compared to the value of the land that was taken away from them. (Both from cultural and economic point of view). This action prevented the Native American community to develop their community and massively reduced their social influence in United States.
Brazil's current Constitution was promulgated in 1988 and completed the democratic institutions. The new Constitution replaced the authoritarian legislation that still remained from the military regime. In 1989 Brazil held its first elections for president by direct popular ballot since the 1964 coup.
These are somethings that happened to Brazil with there democracy
They didnt have to move, they stayed in the same spot. <span>In a </span>feudal system<span>, a peasant or worker known as a vassal received a piece of land in return for serving a lord or king, especially during times of war. Vassals were expected to perform various duties in exchange for their own fiefs, or areas of land.</span>
Answer:
Restrictive population policies
Explanation:
Restrictive population policies aims at promotion of birth control among certain group so that economic and social warfare problems are prevented.
