Answer:
Explanation:
The scope of private property rights in the United States has been greatly reduced during the 20th century. Much of the reduction occurred episodically, as governmental officials took control of economic affairs during national emergencies—mainly wars, depressions, and actual or threatened strikes in critical industries. Derogations from private rights that occurred during national emergencies often remained after the crises had passed. A “ratchet” took hold. People adjusted first their actions, then their thinking, to accommodate themselves to emergency governmental controls. Later, lacking the previous degree of public support, private property rights failed to regain their pre-crisis scope.
Emergency restrictions of private property rights are by no means of concern only to historians of the growth of governmental power. Today, emergency restrictions limit many private rights, and many more sweeping restrictions could be lawfully imposed at the President’s discretion. The possibility is real. Like several presidents before him, Ronald Reagan has dipped repeatedly into the government’s reservoir of emergency economic powers. The potential exists for the greatly expanded use—and abuse—of such powers.
Answer:
Mean for shop A because the data distribution is symmetric; median for shop B because the data distribution is not symmetric
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>C. I dislike driving on a road that has a lot of curves.
</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
A relative clause is one sort of ward condition with a subject and action word, yet cannot remain solitary as a sentence. It is now and then called an adjective clause since it capacities like a modifier it gives more data about a thing. A relative statement consistently starts with a "relative pronoun," which substitutes for an idea, a thing, expression, or a pronoun when sentences are joined.
Restrictive relative conditions give information that characterizes the thing—data that is essential for the complete ID of the situation. Use "that" or "which" for non-human things; use "that" or "who" for human traits.
Answer:
I believe it is federal and state levels
Explanation:
