Answer:
If you enter a road from a driveway, alley or roadside you must:
Yield to vehicles already on the main road.
Explanation:
The concept of right to way is supposed to be understand since there are no law that actually grants the right of way since it only states when the right of way is to be yielded. This concept has to be considered and well understood by all motorists to avoid conflict on roads. These conflicts often cause accidents which can lead to possible loss of life. Thus the rules governing right of way have to be taken very seriously to minimize the probability of accident.
In the following cases the right of way has to be yielded;
1. When one is at a yield sign for example; a stop sign
2. At a pedestrian crosswalk
3. At intersections that don't have traffic lights or where there is uncontrolled movement
4. At T intersections where one has to yield to motorists already on the main road
5. When one needs to turn left into the main road, one needs to yield to oncoming vehicles on the main road
6. One one is moving from a parking lot to the pavement
In our case, rule number four applies since one needs to enter from a driveway alley or roadside to the main road. This means that one on the driveway needs to yield to vehicles already on the main road.
Explanation:
Trade offs are something in which there are two things and we choose one of them according to our own preference or need. This is and should be our personal decision, but when Corporations and Governments decide on what to choose between two things, there would might be a negative impact on someone's life. He might feel controlled by the corporations and governments. For example, if corporations of CNG decides with the government that it is better for consumers to use CNG than Petrol in their cars, and lowers taxes on CNG and encourage consumers to shift towards CNG, then this trade off will have an impact of being controlled by the big giants. The choice should be of consumer's. The consumer should be the one who will trade off between things who are preferable for him.
Before the times of the labor unions, both the employer and the employee reserved the right of employment at will, meaning either one could terminate the agreement at any time and for any reason.
The correct term for the situation proposed in the question is employment at will. The other options describe agreements that have arisen since the creation of the labor unions.
The first option, a closed shop, described an agreement made between the hiring party and the labor unions in which the hiring party agrees to <u>only hire members of the union</u>, while an open shop is just the opposite.
Collective bargaining, on the other hand, is the long process in which the workers of an institution work through their labor unions in order to <u>negotiate contracts </u><u>and the terms of </u><u>employment</u><u>, which include income and benefits. </u>
Therefore the only option that existed prior to the development of labor unions is employment at will, which allowed the termination of a contract at any time for any reason.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/518131?referrer=searchResults
Under the FLSA, information concerning employees’ wages must
be maintained by employer such as having to pay during the payroll period, the
proper total additions to or deductions from wages should be followed and the
amount and nature of the exempt pay should be followed correctly.
This "lessens" rivalry, since buyers become "less" price-sensitive.
Price sensitivity is how much the cost of an item influences customers' buying practices. In financial matters, price sensitivity is usually estimated utilizing the price elasticity of demand. For instance, a few buyers are not willing to pay even a couple of additional pennies per gallon for gas, particularly if a lower-valued station is adjacent.
