I believe the answer is: <span>fluid intelligence
</span><span>fluid intelligence refers to the form of intelligence that allow us to utilize our logic to solve the problem or identify the patterns that we never encountered before.
For most people, </span><span>fluid intelligence would peak when we enter middle age and would start to deteriorate from that point.</span><span />
Answer :
are sometimes sensitive to the sample size and can take this into account when making a judgement
Explanation:
The sample size here is really small and as such is insufficient for the exercise/ experiment. Participants were unable or rather unwilling to answer the question or make extrapolation on the obesity of the tribe given the sample size insufficiency. This therefore shows participants are considering sample size in making judgements or extrapolation on the tribe here
The answer is B: had twice as many soldiers as Lee.
The siege of Petersburg was a decisive Yankee victory which led to the retreat and surrender of confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee. The victory by the union at Petersburg meant that Lee would be forced into a role not familiar to the fantastic Southern commander. If General Lee would have a larger army, a few good peers, and more support, he could possibly have extended the war. However, the war was over and the Siege of Petersburg sealed everything.
Answer:
A - Anxiety; defense mechanisms.
Explanation:
To prevent anxiety, related to a failure to satisfy oneself, the id and superego, it's common to develop and use defense mechanisms. The American Psychological Association (APA) defines anxiety as "an emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts and physical changes like increased blood pressure." The defense mechanisms, which may vary from one person to the next, are ways of relieving that anxiety and relaxing the tension, the constant monitoring of one's future and worrying.
Answer:
external
Explanation:
The process of applying the conclusion of a particular scientific study into a study which is outside its context is said to be external validity. The conclusions derived in one particular study is applied to other situations through external validity. There are cases when such generalization brings a negative result to the study. Also, the factor of generalization is limited to some extent.
