1. South Asia and the Mediterranean regions were among the first places where civilizations spurred. These civilizations started to develop on the basis of agriculture, as the production of enough food was the most important. Once this problem was solved, the people started to specialize and engage into other activities. One of the first activities was to trade goods with the surrounding people. As these civilizations had at disposal certain goods that were highly demanded, they used this in their advantage, and through the trade they managed to gradually get lot of wealth, and that wealth was invested in further development of their societies.
2. Because the people in these two regions managed to obtain wealth through trade, they were able to invest in their societies. This resulted in the formation of larger settlements, cities, which were made in a highly organized and aesthetic manner. As the people had lot of free time in these cities, they were able to engage into other activities, such as the sciences and philosophy. The people started to think about life, the universe, the nature, how and why the things happen. Gradually this had given rise to the first thinkers and philosophers, and as the alphabets were developed, they started to write down their thoughts, thus leaving them for the future generations.
Answer:
The answer is - Regulating local workplaces was beyond the scope of understanding of interstate commerce at the time and was, therefore, perceived to be an unconstitutional exercise of power by the federal government.
Explanation:
The supreme court struck down the attempts by congress to regulate child labor and factory conditions in local workplaces because the court because it disapproved child labor and saw it as an unconstitutional exercise of power by the federal government in attempting to manage a purely local matter, workplace condition. It therefore concluded that the harm of child labor had nothing to do with interstate commerce and was out of the reach of congressional power.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
