Answer: (e.) The same pay as either a professor or as a chief economist at the Humane Society.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be <u>option (e)</u> because in this case there lies an ambiguity i.e. we are uncertain about skillets that an economists should be endowed with or for being a faculty member.
Therefore , it can be concluded that he would get at least as good pay as being faculty. In both cases he'll be better off.
Not positive, but I would put "influencer" because he is helping with a decision.
The two-stage dividend growth model assesses a stock's present price based on the presumption that it will increase in value at a different rate eternally after growing at a fixed rate for a set period of time.
The payout increases steadily in the first phase for a predetermined period of time. In the second, it is presumable that the dividend will increase at a different pace for the rest of the company's existence.
A mathematical technique called the dividend growth model allows investors to determine a realistic fair value for a company's stock based on its current dividend payout and projected dividend growth in the future.
Learn more about two-stage dividend growth model here.
brainly.com/question/28202802
#SPJ4
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
Answer:
a. A company's book value reflects the company's history of equity investment and retained earnings; a company's market value reflects investor's view of the company's future earning prospects.
Explanation:
The book value of a company is the residual equity and retained earnings after all liabilities paid. Market value is the view of investor's about the company and is what the company would be worth if it were to be sold.
