1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tino4ka555 [31]
3 years ago
11

3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the

Mathematics
1 answer:
Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

You might be interested in
Determine the place value of the digit 2 in the following whole number: 3,204,000
andrey2020 [161]

The hundred thousand place

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a coin weighs 3/4, debra picked up 6 of these coins, what is the total weight of coins she picked up?
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

4.5

Hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
What is the estimated product of 908*67
professor190 [17]
Do 910*70 = 63700 The actual answer is 60,836 so it is pretty close
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Evaluate each value expression for the given value of x: x-5 , x - =22<br> pls fast
masya89 [10]

Answer:

-18

Step-by-step explanation:

-18

brainlest please

6 0
3 years ago
Your friend says she used a common
AfilCa [17]

Step-by-step explanation:

An equivalent fraction can be found by either multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same number or dividing the numerator and the denominator by the same number.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Sara wrote 524 words in her journal. Then she crossed out 56 words and added 95 new words. How many words are written in her jou
    8·1 answer
  • I need help with this pls
    10·2 answers
  • Look at the table to answer the question.
    14·1 answer
  • What is 500 Divided by 4039.905
    6·2 answers
  • Is 0.45545455545… a rational or irrational number?
    12·1 answer
  • 2x - 3y = 16 5x - 3y = 13 Solve the system of equations.
    8·2 answers
  • Expand and simplify<br>(x - 1)(2x + 3)​
    10·2 answers
  • What a deal! Just deShirts is having a 20% off sale. Trixie rushes to the store and buys 14 shirts. When the clerk rings up her
    5·1 answer
  • The population of a nearby town dropped from 7,500 to 6,000 in one year.
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Find the lateral area and surface area of the given prism. Round your
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!