Answer:
It is a very critical factor for companies to comply with what the Occupational Risk Prevention law says. Companies are responsible for achieving a safe work environment, and all the sanctions will fall on them if they fail to comply with appropriate security measures, such as an economic, criminal or civil sanction, depending on each situation
Explanation:
The Law on Occupational Risk Prevention aims to guarantee safety and health in the workplace, by complying with certain labor measures. The worker can have a civil responsibility in case of not acting correctly, and will have to answer for it legally if it causes damage to third parties. However, it is finally the company that must respond even when workers cease to comply with their safety obligations.
A good prevention reduces the risk of endangering the integrity of workers. On the other hand, there are various sanctions against companies that do not comply with these measures, the most important is the economic damage, which should be avoided. In more serious cases, criminal or civil liability could also exist, but it would depend on the situation
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "• set marketing objectives." The first step in the process of creating a marketing plan is to <span>set marketing objectives. The group must know the goals and objectives why they are making a business or something.</span>
Answer:
hedonic Theory of Wages:
Accept just two kinds of occupations in the work showcase (safe employments versus unsafe occupations). Under this, sheltered employments have likelihood of zero that specialist gets harmed. Unsafe occupations have likelihood of 1 and laborers know this. Laborers care about whether their occupations are sheltered or hazardous.
Laborers expand utility by picking wage-chance blends that offer them the best measure of utility. Expect laborers disdain hazard, yet to various degrees, for example they have diverse ideal pay chance blends. Firms are on their isoprofit bends that give the hazard wage mixes that give zero (financial) benefit. They vary between firms. An indulgent pay work mirror the connection among wages and occupation qualities. It matches laborers with various hazard inclinations with firms that can give employments that coordinate these diverse hazard inclinations.
Apathy bends uncover the exchange offs that a laborer favors among wages and level of hazard (chance thought to be an 'awful'). To give a similar utility, dangerous occupations must compensation higher wages than safe employments. The more prominent the laborer's aversion for hazard, the more prominent the pay off required for changing from a safe to an unsafe activity, and the more noteworthy the booking cost. As the pay firms bring to the table for hazardous occupations increments, less firms will extend to dangerous employment opportunities and bringing about a descending slanting interest bend as it turns out to be increasingly productive for firms to make occupations spare than to pay the higher compensation.
Suppositions of Differential Wage Theory are:
- The compensation differential is sure. Hazardous employments pay more than spare occupations.
- The balance wage differential is that of the last laborer employed (the peripheral specialist). It's anything but a proportion of the normal abhorrence for chance among laborers in the work showcase.
- Along these lines, everything except the minimal specialist are overcompensated by the market.
On the off chance that a few specialists like to work in dangerous occupations (they are eager to pay for the option to be harmed) and if the interest for such laborers is little, the market repaying differential is negative. At point P, where supply rises to request, laborers utilized in unsafe occupations acquire not as much as laborers utilized in safe employments. The outline given beneath shows the circumstance:
Isoprofit Curve:
As it is exorbitant to create well-being, a firm contribution hazard level P* can make the working environment more secure for example move left on flat pivot, just on the off chance that it diminishes compensation while keeping benefits consistent, so that the iso-benefit bend is upward slanting. Higher isoprofit bend returns lower benefit.
Answer:
E) 1920
Explanation:
The computation of the maximum items in process is shown below:
= Number of maximum target cycle time × normal processing rate per minute × number of minutes in one hour
= 16 hours × 2 × 60 minutes
= 1,920
Simple we multiply the all items which are given in the question, so that the accurate value can come i.e maximum target cycle time, normal processing rate per minute and the number of minutes in one hour
customer satisfaction; earn long-term profits; increased shareholder value