Hey there,
Based on my research, Your correct answer would be "China".
<span>In what country did the Boxer Rebellion occur?
</span>
<span>
~Jurgen</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
3. If you do not exist with a permanent identity, can you be held accountable for actions in previous realities (karma)?
Firstly, Buddhism teaches a concept called karma in which actions of previous life are transference during rebirth and it is on such fact that your actions have results, and that a future state of mind inhabiting a body directly descended from the one the present you is experiencing, that gives the impression of a continuity of self, the body that mind is conscious of changes slowly enough that each instant of consciousness can identify with the ones before, and you get the illusion of a self.our Mind has already accumulated all of the past deeds in their memory. It will also memorize current and future deeds and pass this along to the next one i.e mind and no one knows the exact time it will show the result (Vipaka). It may be in this life time, next life or beyond.
If there is no self (no permanent identity), how can any self (person) be judged for past, present or future actions? When there is no self, there is a condition of judgment, but there is no one that suffers that judgment
Answer:
It can be considered copyright infringement, but it has to be proven.
Explanation:
Intellectual property refers to all the original works that are created and/or owned by a party, such as an individual or an enterprise. Intellectual property is protected by different laws, either as copyright, patent, or trade secrets. Copyright law protects works, patent law protects certain processes or inventions, and trade secret laws protect information that is necessary for an enterprise to work. Anyone who willfully steals protected intellectual property is commiting infringement.
In our case, software is a tricky area. It is not uncommon for different programmers to arrive at the same solution independently, in which case there's no copyright infringement. But if a programmer willingly "borrows" or "paraphrases" certain ideas from another programmer, the affected party can argue copyright infringement. However, in order to do so, it must prove that there has been infringement. <u>Paraphrasing can be detected if the affected party can prove that the processes and lines of code are close enough that the resemblance between the code can be explained only by copying</u>. But if the other party can establish with enough credibility that it arrived at the solution on its own, without any copying, there's no infringement. This type of infringement, if there's any, can be considered copyright infringement. It could only be considered as patent infringement if the paraphrased code had already been registered before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
I think that you will find that Thomas Hobbes is the answer.
The model of self-regulation and driving predicts that an older adult will continue to drive depends on the psychological factors of: self-confidence and need for independence.
<h3>
What is Self Regulation?</h3>
Self-regulation, or the modification of driving by driving less or avoiding challenging situations in response to declining abilities, is increasingly being studied as a way to help older drivers maintain independence and extend the period over which they can safely drive.
However, considerable research gaps remain with respect to whether older drivers can accurately adjust their driving in response to their age-related declines, the extent to which older drivers engage in self-regulatory behaviors, the factors affecting self-regulation, and the extent to which it actually improves safety and mobility.
Learn more about Self Regulation on:
brainly.com/question/1079400
#SPJ4