Answer: C. Reformation
Explanation: A non-compete agreement or clause is a legal binding entered into by two or more parties which restricts the parties from being in competition with the other usually through the sale of similar product. However, in the context above, since the non-compete clause has been breached by Jack, and the judge feels the time constraint in the clause was unreasonably long, The reformation process will be best to remediate the situation, which refers to the change or alteration of the terms of an existing document using the judicial process and requires the conformation of the parties involved.
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
Answer:
Cost variance= 7 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each bat requires 1 kg of aluminum at $18 per kg and 0.25 direct labor hours at $20 per hour. Overhead is assigned at the rate of $40 per direct labor hour. Assume the actual cost to manufacture one metal bat was $40.
Estimated cost= 18 + 0.25*20 + 0.25*40= 33
Actual cost= 40
Cost variance= 7 unfavorable
Full Question:
Edwin is the HR manager at a customer care unit with approximately 1,000 employees. He wants to statistically analyze the service data to make the recruitment process more effective by identifying desirable and undesirable qualities of employees. Edwin observes a high positive correlation between the employees' ability to adapt and the turnaround time. However, he decides to avoid using this criterion when recruiting employees. Which of the following, if true, would MOST strengthen this decision to avoid the criterion
A) The statistical significance of the correlation was found to be sixty percent.
B) Another trait, honesty, had a higher correlation coefficient than employees' ability to adapt.
C) The sample size used by Edwin was significantly larger than what was required.
D) Multiple regressions were observed among the variables used for the analysis.
Answer:
The correct answer here is A)
Explanation:
The key to decision making using statistical research is <em>Statistical Significance. </em>This means that a statistically significant observation is probably true. In this case, the statistical significance of his findings is 60%.
Cheers!
Answer:
The amount after 2 years will be $460590
Explanation:
The payment which is done 2 year from today = $200000
The payment which is done one year from today = $150000
Rate of interest = 3 %
So the amount after 1 year
The amount which is done today = $100000
So amount after 2 years
So total amount after 2 years = $106090+$154500+$200000 = $460590
