Answer:
What does the IRR rule say about whether you should accept this opportunity?
The IRR rule basically states that if the project's internal rate of return (IRR) is higher than the cost of capital (discount rate or WACC), then the project should be accepted. In this case, we are not given the company's WACC or any discount rate we can use, therefore there is nothing to compare the project's IRR against.
Based on prior experience, this project's IRR will not be very high and if we consider the cost of keeping the site clean forever, I really doubt that the project is profitable. If you calculate the project's IRR without including the perpetual cleaning cost, IRR = 11%.
If we assume any of the 3 WACCs I used as an example below, the project's IRR including cleaning costs:
- if WACC = 12%, then IRR = 9.26% REJECTED
- if WACC = 10%, then IRR = 8.98% REJECTED
- if WACC = 9%, then IRR = 8.79% REJECTED
- if WACC = 8%, then IRR = 8.54% ACCEPTED
In order for this project to be profitable, the WACC would need to be very low (around 8% or less).
Explanation:
cost of opening a new mine $120 million
annual cash flow $20 million
expected cleaning costs $2 per year in perpetuity
the cost of keeping the site clean forever = $2 million / discount rate or WACC:
- if WACC = 12%, then perpetual cost = $16.67 million
- if WACC = 10%, then perpetual cost = $20 million
- if WACC = 9%, then perpetual cost = $22.22 million
- if WACC = 8%, then perpetual cost = $25 million
Because a decrease in real autonomous spending results in a <u>fall</u> in the price level, the ultimate effect on real GDP is<u> smaller</u> that predicted by the multiplier.
Another significant discovery is made by Keynesian economics. You've learnt that Keynesians think fluctuations in total spending are what ultimately determine the level of economic activity in the short run (or aggregate demand).
Assume that full employment prevails in an economy because the macro equilibrium occurs at the potential GDP.
Keynes noted that even while the economy starts at potential GDP, it is improbable that it will stay there because aggregate demand has a propensity to fluctuate.
In 2007, the collapse of the housing market caused a decline in U.S. investment spending. The Great Recession subsequently hit the American economy as a result.
To learn more about Keynesian here
brainly.com/question/17247821
#SPJ4
Answer:
C.) Cash budget.
Explanation:
As the name sounds is exactly what it directly entail; as it explains the direct input and output flow pattern of cash in a said organisation or firm. And in most cases, it is seen to access these funds and their usage pattern.
In this case, it can know and give heads up on when their is cash shortage or when a form does not have enough liquidity funds to run it. That is why here, direct and labour budgets are parts of what makes up the cash budget.
Answer:
The computation is shown below:
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For weighted cost of each source of capital is
Debt:
= Cost of debt × Weight of debt
= 9% × 50%
= 4.5%
Equity
= Cost of equity × weight of equity
= 16% × 0.15
= 2.4%
Preferred stock
= Cost of preferred stock × weight of preferred stock
= 12.50% × 35%
= 4.375%
Now the weighted average cost of capital is
= 4.5% + 2.4% + 4.375%
= 11.275%
Therefore in the first part we multiplied the cost with the weight of each source of capital
And, then we add the all answers
Answer:
(a) 0; 0
(b) $150 per hour; $16.67 per hour
(c) (b) $150 per hour; $53.57 per hour
Explanation:
(a) Number of hours = 125
Marginal cost = 0 (since service is cost less upto 200 hours)
Average cost = 0
(b) Number of hours = 225
Marginal cost = $150 per hour
Total cost = $150 × (225 - 200)
= $150 × 25
= $3,750
Average cost = Total cost ÷ Number of hours
= $3,750 ÷ 225
= $16.67 per hour
(c) Number of hours = 325
Marginal cost = $150 per hour
Total cost = $150 × (325 - 200)
= $150 × 125
= $18,750
Average cost = Total cost ÷ Number of hours
= $18,750 ÷ 325
= $53.57 per hour
