Answer:
$45 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Book value of assets = $940 million
Market value of assets = $985 million
Book value of liabilities = $900 million
Market value of liabilities = $930 million
off-balance-sheet assets = $150 million
Off-balance-sheet liabilities = $160 million
Now,
Stockholders Net worth
= Market value of assets + Off balance sheet assets - Market value of liabilities - Off balance sheet liabilities
= $985 million + $150 million - $930 million - $160 million
= $45 million
Answer: <em>Oligopolistic Competition</em>
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case we can state that the competition that persists in this scenario is <em>Oligopolistic Competition. </em>It is referred to as the situation in a market under which there tend to be only few sellers that further sell a differentiated product, here the seller tends to have higher percentage of market control and thus they further cannot allow themselves to disregard the conduct of other sellers.
Answer: Cooperative
Explanation:
A cooperative is an independent association of people united voluntarily in order to meet their common economic, cultural and social needs and through a jointly owned enterprise.
A cooperative society is a group of people who possess specific common needs. The purpose of a cooperative society is to improve the economic status of its members. Cooperative societies usually offer their products to their members at a discount.
Answer: B. Shampoo and conditioner, with an elasticity of -3.5.
Explanation:
Complimentary products are those which see their quantity demanded move together because the goods usually compliment each other like tea and sugar.
Their Cross-price elasticity shows this by being a negative figure. This is because when the price of one commodity goes up, the quantity demanded of the other goes down because higher prices lead to lower quantity demanded.
The actual question showed that Conditioner and Shampoo had a cross-price elasticity of -3.5 so this is the correct answer.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
