Answer:The Articles of Confederation created a union of sovereign states. An assembly of delegates acted on behalf of the states they represented. Because the smaller states feared the domination of the larger ones, each state had one vote in the Confederation Congress, regardless of its size or population.
Explanation:
William few’s main contribution to the constitutional convention was delivering nationalist votes at crucial times.
C) delivering nationalist votes at crucial times.
<u>Explanation:</u>
William Few was a son British men moved from England to Pennsylvania. Few entered into the politics and elected in the Georgia province's congress.
He served for the continental congress( during the period 1780-88) and also elected again for the Georgia province's assembly(1783). Later, he got appointed with one of the six delegates of the Constitutional Convention in 1787 parallel along with congress.
He missed a lot of meetings because of congress's service so he never made a speech at the convention. Yet he came up with nationalist votes at the critical times for the country.
Answer:
Overgeneralization
Explanation:
In psychology, Overgeneralization is a term used to describe an issue that affects mostly mentally ill people with anxiety or depressive disorders on a regular basis. It occurs when someone thinks and applies only one experience and generalize it to all other experiences, including those yet to occur. In this case, just for once that her professor did not say hello back to her, she is already thinking of the future (if she would pass the class) and if her professor was angry at her.
Answer:
b. A study in which subjects were assigned to study activities based on an undesirable or unflattering physical characteristic as assessed by members of the research team.
Explanation:
In case the subjects were used in the study judging by their unconventional, undesirable or unflattering looks and physical characteristics, it is better not to tell them the additional information after the study is concluded.
<u>In that case, reveling the additional information can result in subjects being hurt, offended and angry, the reason for choosing them may seem unethical and wrong, and the researcher (and the study) could be put in the problem.</u>
The subjects should not be harmed in the process and this study might cause them emotional harm.
This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
