Answer:
We can assume that both Strike and Bailey are American companies and that they operate in that US under the UCC rules. Under UCC rules they are both considered merchants since they trade with the goods related to the contract. Strike's offer was very precise and Bailey's acceptance was made in a reasonable manner which can be considered a valid acceptance.
The only difference exists with the shipping company, which the UCC rules consider a conflicting term and Strike should have either objected or ratified it before sending the goods. Since Strike didn't object Bailey's terms, then by using a different truck company it is breaching the contract.
Answer:
A programmer anticipated a positive whole number, and the user input a negative decimal value.
Explanation:
Edge : )
A student loan is an award I think
Answer:
Capitalized value $582.000.
Explanation:
Step 1. Given information.
- The common share of Miser had a fair value of $50 per share.
Step 2. Formulas needed to solve the exercise.
- Fair value of shares = Price per share * (Amount by selling scrap - exchanged shares)
- Capitalized value = fair value of shares - value of scrap.
Step 3. Calculation.
Fair value of shares = $50 * (18.000 - 6.000) = $600.000
<em />
<em>Land should be capitalized by fair market value of share exchanged less any recovery of scrap as land will be developed for future plant. </em>
Step 4. Solution.
<em />
Fair value of shares = $50*12.000 = $600.000
Less: value of scrap = $18.000 .
Capitalized value = $600.000 - $18.000 = $582.000.
