Question

2. Why do you think it is so important that all evidence be identified (such as marking the bullets and tagging firearms)? What consequences might result if these procedures were not followed?

Answer 1

Not tagging and identifying is breaking the chain of evidence and the items would not be admissible as evidence in court,

Hope this Helps! <(￣︶￣)>

Answer 2

Answer:

Identifying the evidence contributes to the conclusion of the case. If the evidence is not identified, some important information may be lost.

Explanation:

Evidence is any evidence, whether through documents or witnesses, that gives the judge responsible for a criminal case the conviction about the truth of the facts. The evidence in crimes is responsible for determining the real perpetrator of the act. For this reason, evidence must be identified and protected in a very delicate and precise manner so that nothing is lost or contaminated. If evidence is not identified it can be discarded, or contaminated, so some important information about the case would be lost and this would make it difficult to resolve the case.