Answer:
The dimension of personality that describes James is Agreeableness
Explanation:
The big five theory classifies and defines the personality of people in five dimensions, these are:
- Openness to experience
- Conscientiousness
- Extroversion
- Agreeableness
- Neuroticism
Each of the categories is characterized by different behaviors, and these categories can be identified at the positive or negative pole. For example, The Agreeableness dimension identifies cooperative, compassionate and kind people, they are people who do not have a hard time establishing interpersonal relationships but at the negative pole avoid discussions or any hostile situation.
For example, in the James case, it can be observed that he moves away from the situation of fighting between his partners, this behavior could identify James in the dimension of the personality Agreeableness, this makes James a submissive person and prefers to move away from hostile situations.
<em></em>
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
<u>Answer:
</u>
The two analytical frameworks that sport historians begin to use in the 1970s to make sense of data they collected in their research of the history of physical activity were modernization theory and human agency.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to delve down into the nuances of the development of sports through different times, the sports historians found it necessary to study the details of the process of modernization. This study helped them determine how modernization helped sports to get shaped to their modern forms.
- Their study also included how different sports were taken forward by humans as the carrying agents of the sports and the changes that happened to sports during the process of carrying forward generation to generation.
Answer:
The answer is B. Establish an absolute ruler.
Explanation:
The answer would be postmodernity. <span>This is the monetary or social state or state of society which is said to exist after innovation. A few schools of thought hold that advancement finished in the late twentieth century – in the 1980s or mid 1990s – and that it was supplanted by postmodernity, while others would stretch out innovation to cover the improvements meant by postmodernity, while some trust that innovation finished after World War II. The possibility of the post-current condition is at times portrayed as a culture stripped of its ability to work in any direct or independent state instead of the dynamic mindstate of Modernism.</span>
