Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
<span>Research has shown that, among u.s. couples that live together before marriage, there are higher rates of divorce.
Contrary to popular belief, people who live together before getting married will actually get sick of each other faster, instead of solidifying their relationship. Research suggests that they should start their marriage and then learn as they go.
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is d.) extrinsic motivation.
Explanation:
Extrinsic motivation is defined as a behavior that is motivated or fueled by an external stimuli, an stimuli outside the individual, as its opposed to intrinsic motivation which comes from inside the individual. Often in extrinsic motivation the external reward could be related with money, fame, praise; so in this order of ideas when Tomas practices long hours fo hockey but not because of the sport but for getting an athletic scholarship he's motivated by an external reward, therefore illustratin extrinsic motiviation.