Answer:
a) Personal conflict is encouraged
Explanation:
<em>Note: from the way the question is redacted I am assuming that the question actually is "The personal values of team members on high-performing teams can be enhanced through all of the following beneficial communication practices EXCEPT" so, I'll give my personal answer based on that. </em>
<em />
The term high performing teams refers to teams or groups that are highly focused on their goals and that achieve superior business results. High-performance teams outperform all other similar teams and they outperform expectations given their composition.
Within these kind of teams all important topics are openly discussed since the main goal is to get superior results, as a consequence of this, problems that might present within the team or outside of it are proactively reported. High-performance teams have strong methods of resolving conflict efficiently, so that conflict does not become a roadblock to achieving the team's goals, however, these conflicts have to do with organization problems and not with <u>personal conflicts</u> among the members of the team.
This teams focuses too on mutual trust (trusting in other team members and trusting in the team as an entity) as well as using effective communication methods and channels by putting value in diversity.
<u>Thus, we can see that the only communication practices that do not belong to high-performing teams is: A) personal conflict is encouraged. </u>
<u />
Answer:
A market for cats would have had a positive externality.
Because the cats would kill the rats on sight since that is their natural behavior.
However, it is interesting to mention, that the cat's killing has been more of a "mythic" aspect of this story, since it fails to take into account that since the black death was caused by the<em> yersinia pestis</em> bacteria, cats could have been also infected, and since their interactions with humans are greater than rats or fleas, the real outcome could have been totally unexpected.
<u>Answer:</u> Decide whether laws are consistent with the U. S. Constitution
<em>Supreme Court’s main job is to challenge any laws are consistent with the U.S Constitution.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Basically, Supreme Court has the power to question <em>the national law</em>. As the Supreme Court has the <em>highest power in the country or the state. </em>
It is always considered as Supreme Court has and plays a very vital role in covering the <em>constitutional system for the government.</em>
If you don’t have any option on <em>getting justice than Supreme Court</em> is the last <em>resort to get justice.</em>
Answer:
Absolute monarchy is closest in governance to being a dictatorship. The only difference is it's just a royal dictatorship. Like a dictatorship, an absolute monarchy has no checks and balances in the system. Second closest would be an oligarchy, where a small group of elites exert absolute power.
Explanation:
Make mine the Brainliest
