Answer:
Y = 300 + 2X
Y( in dollars)
It is a functional relationship because a change in the value of X results in a corresponding change in the value of Y. And does not involve any uncertainty.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Annual fixed due = $300
Variable cost = $2 per visit
X = number of visits in a year
Y = total yearly cost.
Y = annual cost + variable cost
Y = $300 + $2×X
Y = 300 + 2X
Y( in dollars)
It is a functional relationship because a change in the value of X results in a corresponding change in the value of Y. And does not involve any uncertainty.
2/10 is the correct answer
Answer:
yeshjjiih horticulture function finding fog
Answer:
The overview of the given problem is outlined in the following segment on the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion of slots or positions that have been missed due to numerous concurrent transmission incidents can be estimated as follows:
Checking a probability of transmitting becomes "p".
After considering two or even more attempts, we get
Slot fraction wasted,
= ![[1-no \ attempt \ probability-first \ attempt \ probability-second \ attempt \ probability+...]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B1-no%20%5C%20attempt%20%5C%20probability-first%20%5C%20attempt%20%5C%20probability-second%20%5C%20attempt%20%5C%20probability%2B...%5D)
On putting the values, we get
= ![1-no \ attempt \ probability-[N\times P\times probability \ of \ attempts]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1-no%20%5C%20attempt%20%5C%20probability-%5BN%5Ctimes%20P%5Ctimes%20probability%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20attempts%5D)
= ![1-(1-P)^{N}-N[P(1-P)^{N}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1-%281-P%29%5E%7BN%7D-N%5BP%281-P%29%5E%7BN%7D%5D)
So that the above seems to be the right answer.