This question is based off of your own opinion, so I'll give you some basic information and also my opinion.
The Great Compromise was a Compromise between two different plans for the government: The New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan. The main difference between the two is how the states are represented. The Virginia plan wanted states to have votes proportional to their population in Congress. The New Jersey wanted all states to have equal votes.
In the end, they compromised by saying the Senate would follow the New Jersey plan, and the House of Representatives, the Virginia plan. The Senate would have more power than the House of Representatives.
Personally, I think the Great Compromise created a functional and fair representative Congress, because it gave all states a voice in Congress, and didn't give some lots more power than others. It also gave the people some power with the Virginia plan, with the Representatives being based off of population.
The most common description of utilitarianism concerns the welfare of sentient beings, those who are capable of pain and pleasure, in some cases even nonhumans. This description is why, in modern times, utilitarianism has been used in discussions about the suffering of nonhuman animals and ethical aspects involved in the production of food-producing animals.
According to Kant, the maximization of the good for those involved, the basic premise of utilitarianism with regard to moral action in society, is irrelevant from the point of view of those individuals concerned with the maximization of the good, or the positive outcome of their actions. actions, only for themselves, without caring about other people.
Deontological Ethics is a treatise on duties and morals. It is a theory about the choices of individuals, which is morally necessary and serves to guide what really should be done.
Contextual
i really hope this helps
Answer :they probably meant 11, 13 and 14
Explanation: