No scientific testing has been made to check for ion transfer, and the claims are purely empirical. Also, nine out of ten people is hardly a representative sample, and the people can claim whatever they want since "feeling" is subjective. This is most likely a pseudoscientific claim, made to sound legitimate to consumers. The best answer is choice D.
The second one since you’re changing the soil up by adding different fertilisers. This will be you’re independent variable. And you’re dependent variable is your result = the plant height .
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
a) Not Accurate
b) Not Accurate
c) Accurate
d) Accurate
Explanation:
Part a
Not Accurate, because destructive interference would lead to maximum possible magnitude of < 3 m
Part b
Not Accurate, because constructive interference would lead to minimum possible magnitude of > 2 m
Part c
Accurate, because destructive interference would lead to maximum possible magnitude of < 3 m by varying the phase difference between two waves she can achieve the desired results.
Part d
Accurate, because constructive interference would lead to minimum possible magnitude of > 2 m by varying the phase difference between two waves she can achieve the desired results.
they are added vectorially. If htere is a resultant force, the thing acclerates. If they vectorially add to zero, thing doesn't move