Answer:
Your answer is true!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
Your welcomee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Party organization
D. A group dedicated to electing the party’s candidates.
The "party" as an "organization" have a established national office and full time staffs of their own. These party are governed by their own sets of rules and laws. They also have party budgets to spend on election campaigns and meetings . The party organization have a dedicated group which pursues electoral victory.
Party in government
B. An alliance of current officeholders cooperating to shape public policy.
The "party in the government" includes elected officials those who represent themselves as party members (such as President and Congress). These leaders always take part in shaping and framing the public policies.
Party in electorate
A. Those voters who identify with the party and regularly vote for its nominees
The "party in electorate" are people who think themselves as party members but are not officially. These voters or people do not have any party membership cards. These voters regularly influences other to vote and they vote for their nominees.
C or b but I think it is c
