All human rights are indivisible, whether they are civil and political rights, such as the right to life, equality before the law and freedom of expression; economic, social and cultural rights, such as the rights to work, social security and education, or collective rights, such as the rights to development and self.
<span>The answer is 45-65. Middle aged adults would be expected to cope best with the trauma because they have greater coping resources than younger individuals. However, older adults would respond to the trauma worse because they have greater problems with health. This means that displacement from their homes would pose a larger problem for older adults than middle aged individuals.</span>
Answer:
C. applied unequally across states.
Explanation:
The case of Furman V. Georgia occured in 1972. At that time, most states did not necessarily 'Banned' the use of death penalty as a punishment. But the problems occurred because it seems that each states have different standard when determining which type of criminals should be sentenced with death penalty.
Example of the unequal application :
Furman was sentenced to death penalty because he killed someone during an attempted robbery. But criminals who convicted with the same charge in California at that time was punished with 25 years of prison time. Not death penalty.
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
Answer:
sultans fight for what is right
calpihs are like successors
Explanation:
can you mark brainliest
