Answer:
The following explains the outcome and significance of the District of Columbia v. Heller case,
The Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller, that the Second Amendment allows law-abiding U.S. citizens to own and carry handguns in the district.
Explanation: In the 2008 landmark Supreme Court Case The District of Columbia v. Heller, it was found that the Second Amendment allows LAW ABIDING citizens to own and carry handguns in the District of Columbia (Washington, DC). This case found the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. The Act of 1975 called for handguns used for home and self defense to be unloaded, disassembled, and/or locked.
Answer:
The answer is OCPD (obssessive-compulsive personality disorder).
Explanation:
A person who suffers from OCPD has unwanted, repeated thoughts that drive them to carry out an action (compulsion). The insisting of Monk about following a rigid order is an example of his compulsion.
People wth OCPD might show themlseves as reserved and absent-minded. This a result of their obssesive thoughts, which occupy their minds most of the time.
Answer:
C:insurrection
Explanation:
Those terrorists get jail time now.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Delegate".
Explanation:
- One individual sent or approved to serve another, especially an elected official sent to a meeting is a Delegate.
- A delegate's illustration seems to be a politician who will be acting on behalf of the majority of citizens.
Therefore, the Delegate is the right answer.