Answer: The rejection of the claim about aspirin is more significant as compared to that of vitamin C.
It is because the significant level of aspirin is more dangerous as compared to that of vitamin C.
The dosage of aspirin in the bottle must be accurate as compared to that of vitamin C because it would not cause any harm to the body if exceeded the limits.
It would be wise to use smaller significant level for testing the claim about aspirin.
Answer:
The second line of defense.
Explanation:
The second line of defense, part of the immune system response, is Nonespecific Resistance.
Its just that the body is responding to it differently
